Outcome: Dismissed
Aug052009_01B2203
Our summary
Peking Opera performer claimed extraordinary ability through competition wins and professional association membership. AAO affirmed denial, finding awards lacked evidence of national or international recognition, association membership did not require outstanding achievement, and overall evidence did not demonstrate sustained acclaim at the very top.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Competition awards lack documentation of nationally or internationally recognized status; participation certificates are not prizes or awards
- Membership · Membership in theater association does not demonstrate outstanding achievement as essential condition; admission based on expert discretion insufficient
- Final merits · Evidence does not set petitioner significantly above almost all others at national or international level in field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Competition awards lack documentation of nationally or internationally recognized status; participation certificates are not prizes or awards | |
| Not met | Membership in theater association does not demonstrate outstanding achievement as essential condition; admission based on expert discretion insufficient | |
| Not met | Evidence does not set petitioner significantly above almost all others at national or international level in field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
