EB-1AEducation and academiaIndividualDecided 2007Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Aug092007_05B2203
AwardsNot metJudgingNot metOriginal contributionsNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Sociology and political science researcher in Uzbekistan seeks EB-1A. Decision holds petitioner failed to meet any three criteria for extraordinary ability. Awards not established as nationally or internationally recognized; judging role documented by brief certificate lacking substantive evidence; no demonstrated major impact on field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No evidence of major internationally recognized awards submitted
- Judging · Certificate of academic council membership lacks substantive evidence of judging work or sustained national or international acclaim
- Original contributions · No demonstrable major impact on Uzbekistan philosophy or field as whole established
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field in any criterion
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | No evidence of major internationally recognized awards submitted |
 Judging | Not met | Certificate of academic council membership lacks substantive evidence of judging work or sustained national or international acclaim |
 Original contributions | Not met | No demonstrable major impact on Uzbekistan philosophy or field as whole established |
 Final merits | Not met | Petitioner failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field in any criterion |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.