Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AEducation and academiaIndividualDecided 2010Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Aug202010_02B2203

AwardsNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A biblical translator sought EB-1A classification. The AAO found the petitioner submitted no qualifying evidence for any of three attempted criteria: a scholarship was not a recognized prize, association membership lacked documentation of outstanding achievement requirements, and published materials were insufficient. The decision also noted failure to demonstrate prospective substantial benefit to the United States.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Sarvodaya scholarship does not qualify as nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence.
  • Membership · Petitioner failed to submit bylaws or constitutions establishing that associations require outstanding member achievements.
  • Published material · Evidence submitted did not meet plain language requirements of regulatory criterion.
  • Final merits · Evidence demonstrates talent but does not show sustained national or international acclaim or placement at very top of field; no benefit to United States shown.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metSarvodaya scholarship does not qualify as nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence.
MembershipNot metPetitioner failed to submit bylaws or constitutions establishing that associations require outstanding member achievements.
Published materialNot metEvidence submitted did not meet plain language requirements of regulatory criterion.
Final meritsNot metEvidence demonstrates talent but does not show sustained national or international acclaim or placement at very top of field; no benefit to United States shown.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.