Outcome: Dismissed
DEC032024_03B2203
Our summary
A youth soccer league employer-petitioning for EB-1A extraordinary ability for a soccer coach beneficiary. Claimed five evidentiary criteria; none met. Record lacks personal awards, qualifying membership evidence, and published material in major outlets. AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national acclaim or upper-echelon status required for extraordinary ability.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Beneficiary did not personally receive any nationally or internationally recognized awards; employer awards do not qualify
- Membership · Membership in FA Coaches' Club lacks demonstration of outstanding achievements or expert judgment requirement
- Published material · No evidence that articles were published in professional publications or major media outlets
- Final merits · Beneficiary has not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier status in field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Beneficiary did not personally receive any nationally or internationally recognized awards; employer awards do not qualify | |
| Not met | Membership in FA Coaches' Club lacks demonstration of outstanding achievements or expert judgment requirement | |
| Not met | No evidence that articles were published in professional publications or major media outlets | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; court reserved comparable evidence argument after initial three-criteria failure | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; court reserved comparable evidence argument after initial three-criteria failure | |
| Not met | Beneficiary has not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier status in field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
