Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsEmployerDecided December 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC032024_03B2203

AwardsNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A youth soccer league employer-petitioning for EB-1A extraordinary ability for a soccer coach beneficiary. Claimed five evidentiary criteria; none met. Record lacks personal awards, qualifying membership evidence, and published material in major outlets. AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national acclaim or upper-echelon status required for extraordinary ability.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Beneficiary did not personally receive any nationally or internationally recognized awards; employer awards do not qualify
  • Membership · Membership in FA Coaches' Club lacks demonstration of outstanding achievements or expert judgment requirement
  • Published material · No evidence that articles were published in professional publications or major media outlets
  • Final merits · Beneficiary has not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier status in field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metBeneficiary did not personally receive any nationally or internationally recognized awards; employer awards do not qualify
MembershipNot metMembership in FA Coaches' Club lacks demonstration of outstanding achievements or expert judgment requirement
Published materialNot metNo evidence that articles were published in professional publications or major media outlets
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; court reserved comparable evidence argument after initial three-criteria failure
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; court reserved comparable evidence argument after initial three-criteria failure
Final meritsNot metBeneficiary has not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier status in field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.