Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided December 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC042024_06B5203

Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

An attorney from Brazil seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver in tax and business law. The AAO found the petitioner did not qualify as an advanced degree professional or individual of exceptional ability, lacking required documentation and failing final merits review. Without underlying EB-2 eligibility, the NIW claim was not addressed.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedNot reached; petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 eligibility, prerequisite to NIW analysis.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedNot reached; petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 eligibility, prerequisite to NIW analysis.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedNot reached; petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 eligibility, prerequisite to NIW analysis.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.