Outcome: Dismissed
DEC052025_03B5203
Our summary
An avionics specialist sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification together with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because he did not show ten years of full-time experience with reliable evidence, so he lacked the underlying classification and the waiver analysis was not reached.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not reached / not discussed | Dhanasar prongs were not addressed because the petitioner failed to qualify for the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached since the underlying classification was not established. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached since the underlying classification was not established. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
