Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AElectrical and electronic engineeringIndividualDecided 2015Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC092015_01B2203

JudgingMetLeading or critical roleMetPublished materialMetAwardsNot metMembershipNot metScholarly articlesNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Electrical engineer sought extraordinary ability classification. Met three criteria: judging, published material, and leading role. AAO sustained those findings but rejected the final merits determination, holding evidence showed competence but not sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier status required for EB-1A.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Evaluated dissertations and rated contract bids, satisfying plain language requirement
  • Leading or critical role · Senior engineer at company with distinguished reputation
  • Published material · Director found criterion satisfied; AAO agreed

What was missing

  • Awards · Certificates not nationally or internationally recognized awards for excellence
  • Membership · Memberships do not demonstrate top of field status
  • Scholarly articles · Citations from co-inventor lack wider impact; insufficient recognition beyond employer
  • Final merits · Evidence shows competent engineer but not risen to very top of field or achieved national acclaim

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetEvaluated dissertations and rated contract bids, satisfying plain language requirement
Leading or critical roleMetSenior engineer at company with distinguished reputation
Published materialMetDirector found criterion satisfied; AAO agreed
AwardsNot metCertificates not nationally or internationally recognized awards for excellence
MembershipNot metMemberships do not demonstrate top of field status
Scholarly articlesNot metCitations from co-inventor lack wider impact; insufficient recognition beyond employer
Final meritsNot metEvidence shows competent engineer but not risen to very top of field or achieved national acclaim

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.