Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2017Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC142017_01B2203

ExhibitionsMetPublished materialMetOriginal contributionsNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A representational painter sought EB-1A classification. The AAO found she met only two criteria: published material and display of artwork in exhibitions. Her claim for original contributions was rejected because favorable reviews and sales do not demonstrate field-wide impact. Appeal dismissed.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Director concluded work displayed in artistic exhibitions and showcases; decision affirms
  • Published material · Director determined criterion satisfied; decision affirms this finding

What was missing

  • Original contributions · Reviews and sales do not demonstrate major significance or impact on field; prospective letters insufficient
  • Final merits · Did not meet three criteria threshold; final merits review not required

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetDirector concluded work displayed in artistic exhibitions and showcases; decision affirms
Published materialMetDirector determined criterion satisfied; decision affirms this finding
Original contributionsNot metReviews and sales do not demonstrate major significance or impact on field; prospective letters insufficient
Final meritsNot metDid not meet three criteria threshold; final merits review not required

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.