Outcome: Dismissed
DEC142017_01B2203
Our summary
A representational painter sought EB-1A classification. The AAO found she met only two criteria: published material and display of artwork in exhibitions. Her claim for original contributions was rejected because favorable reviews and sales do not demonstrate field-wide impact. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Director concluded work displayed in artistic exhibitions and showcases; decision affirms
- Published material · Director determined criterion satisfied; decision affirms this finding
What was missing
- Original contributions · Reviews and sales do not demonstrate major significance or impact on field; prospective letters insufficient
- Final merits · Did not meet three criteria threshold; final merits review not required
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director concluded work displayed in artistic exhibitions and showcases; decision affirms | |
| Met | Director determined criterion satisfied; decision affirms this finding | |
| Not met | Reviews and sales do not demonstrate major significance or impact on field; prospective letters insufficient | |
| Not met | Did not meet three criteria threshold; final merits review not required |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
