Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2014Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC152014_03B2203

AwardsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

An artist self-petitioner claimed extraordinary ability through awards and published material. The AAO upheld denial because residencies and fellowships do not constitute recognized prizes and foreign publications lacked complete certified English translations. Aggregate evidence did not demonstrate required expertise level.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Residencies and fellowships are not nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence
  • Published material · Missing complete English translations as required by regulation
  • Final merits · Failed to meet three criteria threshold; evidence in aggregate insufficient for expertise level required

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metResidencies and fellowships are not nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence
Published materialNot metMissing complete English translations as required by regulation
Final meritsNot metFailed to meet three criteria threshold; evidence in aggregate insufficient for expertise level required

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.