EB-1AOtherIndividualDecided 2005Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
DEC162005_07B2203
AwardsNot metLeading or critical roleNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found petitioner failed to meet at least three required criteria through awards, membership, published material, or leading roles, and lacked clear evidence of intent to continue work in the United States. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No evidence of official comprehensive results or degree of recognition for award certificates
- Leading or critical role · Insufficient evidence demonstrating leading or critical role for distinguished organization
- Membership · Membership evaluated at local or regional chapter level does not satisfy criterion
- Published material · No evidence showing published material primarily about petitioner in major publications
- Final merits · Failed to meet at least three criteria; no sustained national or international acclaim established
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | No evidence of official comprehensive results or degree of recognition for award certificates |
 Leading or critical role | Not met | Insufficient evidence demonstrating leading or critical role for distinguished organization |
 Membership | Not met | Membership evaluated at local or regional chapter level does not satisfy criterion |
 Published material | Not met | No evidence showing published material primarily about petitioner in major publications |
 Final merits | Not met | Failed to meet at least three criteria; no sustained national or international acclaim established |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.