Outcome: Dismissed
DEC162005_19B2203
Our summary
Self-petitioner, handicapped marathon athlete, claimed extraordinary ability in athletics. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim through regulatory criteria, had only one award from 1986, and did not establish intent to work as athlete in United States.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Single award in 1986 does not establish sustained acclaim as of 2004 filing
- Membership · Failed to establish organizations require outstanding achievements of members
- Final merits · Did not establish sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Single award in 1986 does not establish sustained acclaim as of 2004 filing | |
| Not met | Failed to establish organizations require outstanding achievements of members | |
| Not met | Did not establish sustained national or international acclaim at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
