Outcome: Dismissed
DEC162024_02B2203
Our summary
Self-petitioner integration architect in energy efficiency claiming extraordinary ability. Advanced three criteria on appeal; failed original contributions as major significance not demonstrated beyond employer context. AAO dismissed appeal because claimed criteria insufficient and aggregate record lacks sustained acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Original contributions · Recommendation letters demonstrate contributions limited to employer projects; no evidence major significance in overall field
- Final merits · No criteria satisfied; aggregate record lacks sustained national or international acclaim in field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Recommendation letters demonstrate contributions limited to employer projects; no evidence major significance in overall field | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; original contributions failure is dispositive | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; original contributions failure is dispositive | |
| Not met | No criteria satisfied; aggregate record lacks sustained national or international acclaim in field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
