Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AEnergy and climateIndividualDecided December 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC162024_02B2203

Original contributionsNot metHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Self-petitioner integration architect in energy efficiency claiming extraordinary ability. Advanced three criteria on appeal; failed original contributions as major significance not demonstrated beyond employer context. AAO dismissed appeal because claimed criteria insufficient and aggregate record lacks sustained acclaim.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Original contributions · Recommendation letters demonstrate contributions limited to employer projects; no evidence major significance in overall field
  • Final merits · No criteria satisfied; aggregate record lacks sustained national or international acclaim in field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Original contributionsNot metRecommendation letters demonstrate contributions limited to employer projects; no evidence major significance in overall field
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; original contributions failure is dispositive
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; original contributions failure is dispositive
Final meritsNot metNo criteria satisfied; aggregate record lacks sustained national or international acclaim in field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.