Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWCivil and environmental engineeringIndividualDecided December 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC162025_05B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot metBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A civil engineer proposed research on traffic safety analysis methods. The AAO held the specific endeavor lacks national importance despite relating to a valued field; the endeavor did not demonstrate broader field impact or prospective significance required by Dhanasar's first prong. Appeal dismissed.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; specific prospective impact insufficient
  • Well positioned · Record does not establish petitioner is well positioned to advance specific endeavor

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metEndeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; specific prospective impact insufficient
Well positionedNot metRecord does not establish petitioner is well positioned to advance specific endeavor
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedFirst and second prongs failed; third prong reserved as unnecessary

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.