Outcome: Dismissed
DEC162025_05B5203
Our summary
A civil engineer proposed research on traffic safety analysis methods. The AAO held the specific endeavor lacks national importance despite relating to a valued field; the endeavor did not demonstrate broader field impact or prospective significance required by Dhanasar's first prong. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; specific prospective impact insufficient
- Well positioned · Record does not establish petitioner is well positioned to advance specific endeavor
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; specific prospective impact insufficient | |
| Not met | Record does not establish petitioner is well positioned to advance specific endeavor | |
| Not reached / not discussed | First and second prongs failed; third prong reserved as unnecessary |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
