Outcome: Dismissed
DEC192022_01B2203
Our summary
An embroiderer seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The petitioner claimed eight of ten regulatory criteria. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner satisfied fewer than three criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Awards submitted lack evidence they were given for excellence in field
- Membership · Association membership criteria and selection process not documented
- Final merits · Petitioner has not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Awards submitted lack evidence they were given for excellence in field | |
| Not met | Association membership criteria and selection process not documented | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Not met | Petitioner has not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
