Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided December 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC222025_01B2203

ExhibitionsMetHigh salaryMetJudgingMetOriginal contributionsMetPublished materialMetAwardsNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Tattoo artist filed motion to reconsider AAO dismissal of EB-1A appeal. AAO had found five criteria met but denied final merits. Motion contests one-time achievement and lesser awards determinations. AAO affirms second place award is not major or internationally recognized and petitioner has not shown sufficient national or international recognition of his awards.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · AAO agreed criterion satisfied relating to display at artistic showcases
  • High salary · AAO determined criterion satisfied on appeal, contrary to SCOPS
  • Judging · AAO agreed with SCOPS that criterion satisfied
  • Original contributions · AAO determined criterion satisfied on appeal, contrary to SCOPS
  • Published material · AAO determined criterion satisfied on appeal, contrary to SCOPS

What was missing

  • Awards · Second place award not a major, internationally recognized award; lesser awards lack sufficient recognition
  • Final merits · Totality of evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or small percentage at top

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetAAO agreed criterion satisfied relating to display at artistic showcases
High salaryMetAAO determined criterion satisfied on appeal, contrary to SCOPS
JudgingMetAAO agreed with SCOPS that criterion satisfied
Original contributionsMetAAO determined criterion satisfied on appeal, contrary to SCOPS
Published materialMetAAO determined criterion satisfied on appeal, contrary to SCOPS
AwardsNot metSecond place award not a major, internationally recognized award; lesser awards lack sufficient recognition
Final meritsNot metTotality of evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or small percentage at top

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.