EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2005Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
DEC272005_14B2203
AwardsNot metExhibitionsNot metLeading or critical roleNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Self-represented painter claimed extraordinary ability in the arts through awards, membership, publications, and exhibitions. The AAO found the awards lacked documentation of national or international stature, the publication was local without major media distribution, and exhibitions were not at significant national venues. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Art contests lacked documentation of stature, criteria, or number of entrants
- Exhibitions · No evidence of regular display at exclusive national venues or major exhibitions
- Leading or critical role · No evidence of leading role for distinguished organization earning sustained acclaim
- Membership · Membership requirements based on employment or activity, not outstanding achievement
- Published material · One-page article in local publication lacks substantial national distribution and author identification
- Final merits · Evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at top level
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Art contests lacked documentation of stature, criteria, or number of entrants |
 Exhibitions | Not met | No evidence of regular display at exclusive national venues or major exhibitions |
 Leading or critical role | Not met | No evidence of leading role for distinguished organization earning sustained acclaim |
 Membership | Not met | Membership requirements based on employment or activity, not outstanding achievement |
 Published material | Not met | One-page article in local publication lacks substantial national distribution and author identification |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at top level |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.