Outcome: Dismissed
DEC282020_03B2203
Our summary
A personal fitness trainer claimed extraordinary ability based on work with one film production. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that she met only one criterion and lacked evidence of sustained national acclaim or top-tier status.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Petitioner was one of three judges at weightlifting competition; director found criterion satisfied
What was missing
- Awards · NPC competition medals not established as nationally or internationally recognized prizes
- Membership · Film production work did not constitute recognized association membership based on outstanding achievements
- Published material · Submitted materials did not meet regulatory requirements for proper attribution and documentation
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Petitioner was one of three judges at weightlifting competition; director found criterion satisfied | |
| Not met | NPC competition medals not established as nationally or internationally recognized prizes | |
| Not met | Film production work did not constitute recognized association membership based on outstanding achievements | |
| Not met | Submitted materials did not meet regulatory requirements for proper attribution and documentation | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient criteria met to proceed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; insufficient criteria met to proceed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; case did not reach final merits determination |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
