Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided December 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC282020_03B2203

JudgingMetAwardsNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzed

Our summary

A personal fitness trainer claimed extraordinary ability based on work with one film production. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that she met only one criterion and lacked evidence of sustained national acclaim or top-tier status.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Petitioner was one of three judges at weightlifting competition; director found criterion satisfied

What was missing

  • Awards · NPC competition medals not established as nationally or internationally recognized prizes
  • Membership · Film production work did not constitute recognized association membership based on outstanding achievements
  • Published material · Submitted materials did not meet regulatory requirements for proper attribution and documentation

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetPetitioner was one of three judges at weightlifting competition; director found criterion satisfied
AwardsNot metNPC competition medals not established as nationally or internationally recognized prizes
MembershipNot metFilm production work did not constitute recognized association membership based on outstanding achievements
Published materialNot metSubmitted materials did not meet regulatory requirements for proper attribution and documentation
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient criteria met to proceed
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; insufficient criteria met to proceed
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; case did not reach final merits determination

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.