Outcome: Dismissed
Dec032009_08B2203
Our summary
A self-petitioner in financial investment sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The petitioner claimed multiple criteria but provided insufficient evidence. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field, and evidence was dated nearly a decade before filing.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award demonstrated by petitioner
- Membership · Association membership does not require outstanding achievement as essential condition
- Original contributions · Letters insufficient; no extensive documentation of unusually influential work
- Final merits · Evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim at top level
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No major internationally recognized award demonstrated by petitioner | |
| Not met | Association membership does not require outstanding achievement as essential condition | |
| Not met | Letters insufficient; no extensive documentation of unusually influential work | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed by AAO | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed by AAO | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed by AAO | |
| Not met | Evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim at top level |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
