Outcome: Dismissed
Dec142010_01B2203
Our summary
Researcher, historian, political scientist, and educator sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed multiple criteria including awards, membership, and published material but failed to meet regulatory requirements. AAO upheld denial, finding evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement at the very top of the field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No evidence of major internationally recognized award presented
- Membership · Membership requirements based on employment or experience do not constitute outstanding achievement
- Published material · Article date and publication name not identified as required by regulation
- Final merits · Evidence not persuasive that petitioner significantly above others in field at national or international level
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No evidence of major internationally recognized award presented | |
| Not met | Membership requirements based on employment or experience do not constitute outstanding achievement | |
| Not met | Article date and publication name not identified as required by regulation | |
| Not met | Evidence not persuasive that petitioner significantly above others in field at national or international level |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
