Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ALife sciences and medicineIndividualDecided 2012Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Dec192012_01B2203

AwardsNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Self-petitioner biochemist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found petitioner did not submit sufficient evidence under at least three evidentiary criteria required by regulation; applied two-part Kazarian framework and dismissed appeal.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · No evidence that awards were nationally or internationally recognized beyond scientific meeting context
  • Final merits · Failed to submit qualifying evidence under at least three regulatory criteria

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metNo evidence that awards were nationally or internationally recognized beyond scientific meeting context
Final meritsNot metFailed to submit qualifying evidence under at least three regulatory criteria

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.