Outcome: Dismissed
Dec192012_01B2203
Our summary
Self-petitioner biochemist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found petitioner did not submit sufficient evidence under at least three evidentiary criteria required by regulation; applied two-part Kazarian framework and dismissed appeal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No evidence that awards were nationally or internationally recognized beyond scientific meeting context
- Final merits · Failed to submit qualifying evidence under at least three regulatory criteria
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No evidence that awards were nationally or internationally recognized beyond scientific meeting context | |
| Not met | Failed to submit qualifying evidence under at least three regulatory criteria |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
