Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2011Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Dec212011_01B2203

High salaryMetAwardsClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Visual effects professional claimed extraordinary ability through multiple regulatory criteria and comparable evidence. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed to meet the high burden of demonstrating sustained national or international acclaim and belonging among the very top of the field, despite meeting high salary criterion.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • High salary · Director determined petitioner met this criterion

What was missing

  • Final merits · Evidence does not establish sustained acclaim or position among small percentage at top

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
High salaryMetDirector determined petitioner met this criterion
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; director dismissed without addressing criterion
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; director dismissed without addressing criterion
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; director dismissed without addressing criterion
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; director dismissed without addressing criterion
Final meritsNot metEvidence does not establish sustained acclaim or position among small percentage at top

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.