EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2006Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Dec272006_01B2203
AwardsNot metExhibitionsNot metHigh salaryNot metMembershipNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Self-petitioner artist sought EB-1A classification based on Chinese awards, association membership, and artwork exhibitions. AAO found awards local not international, membership not contingent on achievement, exhibitions unsubstantiated, and compensation unexceptional.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Awards reflected local or provincial recognition only, not national or international; no evidence of significance or selectivity.
- Exhibitions · No evidence of regular participation in exclusive venues devoted largely to petitioner's artwork display.
- High salary · No evidence of compensation significantly higher than others in petitioner's field.
- Membership · Membership evaluated at local or regional chapter level does not demonstrate outstanding achievement as condition for admission.
- Final merits · Acclaim from China not sustained since 1996 entry into United States; failed to meet three criteria for extraordinary ability.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Awards reflected local or provincial recognition only, not national or international; no evidence of significance or selectivity. |
 Exhibitions | Not met | No evidence of regular participation in exclusive venues devoted largely to petitioner's artwork display. |
 High salary | Not met | No evidence of compensation significantly higher than others in petitioner's field. |
 Membership | Not met | Membership evaluated at local or regional chapter level does not demonstrate outstanding achievement as condition for admission. |
 Final merits | Not met | Acclaim from China not sustained since 1996 entry into United States; failed to meet three criteria for extraordinary ability. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.