Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided February 2023Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB012023_02B2203

ExhibitionsMetJudgingMetAwardsNot metPublished materialNot metMembershipClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Fashion designer met only two criteria (judging, exhibitions) and failed three-criterion threshold. AAO dismissed appeal finding insufficient evidence that Mara de Oro Award or Venezuelan publications qualified as nationally or internationally recognized, and that petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim required.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Director determined petitioner met exhibition criterion through display of collections.
  • Judging · Director determined petitioner met judging criterion; AAO did not disturb determination.

What was missing

  • Awards · Mara de Oro Award lacked sufficient supporting evidence establishing national or international recognition in fashion design field.
  • Published material · Published materials not about petitioner's specific work; website visitation data insufficient to establish major media status.
  • Final merits · Failed initial evidentiary step; record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top of field status.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetDirector determined petitioner met exhibition criterion through display of collections.
JudgingMetDirector determined petitioner met judging criterion; AAO did not disturb determination.
AwardsNot metMara de Oro Award lacked sufficient supporting evidence establishing national or international recognition in fashion design field.
Published materialNot metPublished materials not about petitioner's specific work; website visitation data insufficient to establish major media status.
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed by AAO in final determination.
Final meritsNot metFailed initial evidentiary step; record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top of field status.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.