Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided February 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB042020_01B2203

JudgingMetAwardsNot metHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Acrobatic gymnastics coach seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed seven criteria but met only one (judging). AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner satisfied only one criterion when three required, and did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Director found petitioner met judging criterion; AAO agreed

What was missing

  • Awards · No major internationally recognized award demonstrated; coaching awards insufficient
  • Final merits · No sustained national or international acclaim; not among top of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetDirector found petitioner met judging criterion; AAO agreed
AwardsNot metNo major internationally recognized award demonstrated; coaching awards insufficient
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Final meritsNot metNo sustained national or international acclaim; not among top of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.