Outcome: Dismissed
FEB052024_03B2203
Our summary
Veterinary science researcher with bachelor's and master's degrees sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met only two of ten required criteria. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to demonstrate sufficient initial evidentiary requirements for extraordinary ability determination.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Petitioner demonstrated participation as judge of others' work in field.
What was missing
- Awards · Student-level awards with limited competitors do not demonstrate excellence in the field.
- Leading or critical role · Record did not sufficiently establish participation in leading or critical role for distinguished organization.
- Membership · Memberships in associations did not demonstrate they require outstanding achievements as judged by experts.
- Published material · No evidence of published material about petitioner in professional or major media.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Petitioner demonstrated participation as judge of others' work in field. | |
| Not met | Student-level awards with limited competitors do not demonstrate excellence in the field. | |
| Not met | Record did not sufficiently establish participation in leading or critical role for distinguished organization. | |
| Not met | Memberships in associations did not demonstrate they require outstanding achievements as judged by experts. | |
| Not met | No evidence of published material about petitioner in professional or major media. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Only two of ten criteria met; three required; final merits determination not reached. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
