Outcome: Dismissed
FEB072019_01D8101
Our summary
Summary is being reviewed; the table above reflects the decision record.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Won 2008 beauty pageant and appeared in fashion magazines as starring participant
What was missing
- Awards · No evidence of significant national or international award comparable to Academy Award
- High salary · Statistics excluded self-employed models; insufficient evidence of salary compared to field
- Published material · Magazine covers and editorials lack evidence of national or international recognition in qualifying publications
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Won 2008 beauty pageant and appeared in fashion magazines as starring participant | |
| Not met | No evidence of significant national or international award comparable to Academy Award | |
| Not met | Statistics excluded self-employed models; insufficient evidence of salary compared to field | |
| Not met | Magazine covers and editorials lack evidence of national or international recognition in qualifying publications | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or analyzed in decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or analyzed in decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or analyzed in decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or analyzed in decision | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Beneficiary failed to meet three of six evidentiary criteria; final merits step not reached |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
