Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided February 2022Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB072022_01B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Legal analyst seeking EB-2 national interest waiver claimed her consulting work on cross-border corporate matters would generate national economic benefits. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks sufficient prospective impact beyond her employer and clients to demonstrate national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Proposed legal consulting work lacks sufficient prospective impact beyond immediate employer and clients to reach national importance threshold

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metProposed legal consulting work lacks sufficient prospective impact beyond immediate employer and clients to reach national importance threshold
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedDecision did not analyze second prong after finding first prong failed
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedDecision did not analyze third prong after finding first prong failed

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.