Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ALaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided 2016Sustained

Outcome: Sustained

FEB092016_02B2203

JudgingMetOriginal contributionsMetScholarly articlesMetFinal meritsMet

Our summary

A policy analyst seeking EB-1A in sciences met three initial criteria (judging, original contributions, scholarly articles) and demonstrated extraordinary ability in final merits. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding the petitioner had sustained national acclaim at the very top of his field.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Director found petitioner met criterion; AAO affirmed.
  • Original contributions · Director found petitioner met criterion; AAO affirmed.
  • Scholarly articles · Petitioner authored articles in academic journals; meets criterion.
  • Final merits · Sustained national acclaim, original significant works, contributions commensurate with top of field.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetDirector found petitioner met criterion; AAO affirmed.
Original contributionsMetDirector found petitioner met criterion; AAO affirmed.
Scholarly articlesMetPetitioner authored articles in academic journals; meets criterion.
Final meritsMetSustained national acclaim, original significant works, contributions commensurate with top of field.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.