Outcome: Dismissed
FEB112026_05B2203
Our summary
CEO and founder of rapeseed oil company in China claimed extraordinary ability, asserting four criteria. AAO found two criteria met but two not met, failing three-criterion threshold. Final merits not reached. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- High salary · Petitioner demonstrated high salary relative to others in field
- Published material · AAO withdrew service center denial; published articles met criterion
What was missing
- Leading or critical role · Company lacked distinguished reputation; outside perception not established through internal documents
- Original contributions · Patents praised but not shown to be significantly utilized in agricultural manufacturing overall
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Petitioner demonstrated high salary relative to others in field | |
| Met | AAO withdrew service center denial; published articles met criterion | |
| Not met | Company lacked distinguished reputation; outside perception not established through internal documents | |
| Not met | Patents praised but not shown to be significantly utilized in agricultural manufacturing overall | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Initial evidence threshold not met; final merits reserved per Kazarian framework |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
