Outcome: Dismissed
FEB122020_04B2203
Our summary
Amateur bodybuilder claimed extraordinary ability. Director found no criteria met. AAO reviewed all four claimed criteria (awards, membership, published material, leading role) and rejected each: awards not nationally recognized, membership organizations lack expert standards, publications insufficient, and gym lacks distinguished reputation. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Documented receipt of prizes but not nationally or internationally recognized.
- Leading or critical role · Gym organization lacks distinguished reputation; critical role not established.
- Membership · Membership shown but organizations do not require outstanding achievement by recognized experts.
- Published material · YouTube channel not major media; website listings not published material about petitioner.
- Final merits · No criteria met; three required. Record lacks sustained national or international acclaim.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Documented receipt of prizes but not nationally or internationally recognized. | |
| Not met | Gym organization lacks distinguished reputation; critical role not established. | |
| Not met | Membership shown but organizations do not require outstanding achievement by recognized experts. | |
| Not met | YouTube channel not major media; website listings not published material about petitioner. | |
| Not met | No criteria met; three required. Record lacks sustained national or international acclaim. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
