Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceDecided February 2026Remanded

Outcome: Remanded

FEB122026_01B5203

Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A climate change policy analyst sought NIW under EB-2. SCOPS denied the petition solely for defective attorney signatures (photocopied rather than original handwritten). The AAO remanded the matter, holding SCOPS should have processed the petition as if the defective notice of representation had not been submitted.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedMatter remanded on signature deficiency; merits of petition not adjudicated on remand.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedMatter remanded on signature deficiency; merits of petition not adjudicated on remand.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedMatter remanded on signature deficiency; merits of petition not adjudicated on remand.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.