Outcome: Dismissed
FEB142023_02B2203
Our summary
Television and motion picture producer claimed five criteria for EB-1A. AAO rejected published material, judging, and critical role findings; awards and exhibitions not reached. Fewer than three criteria met; no demonstrated sustained acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Judging · Talent festival judging involved unrelated field, not television or motion picture production
- Leading or critical role · No evidence of distinguished reputation of organization or petitioner's critical role within it
- Published material · Self-promoting materials not qualifying; articles lack author attribution required by regulation
- Final merits · Record does not demonstrate national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Talent festival judging involved unrelated field, not television or motion picture production | |
| Not met | No evidence of distinguished reputation of organization or petitioner's critical role within it | |
| Not met | Self-promoting materials not qualifying; articles lack author attribution required by regulation | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; AAO found other criteria failed without reaching awards | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; AAO found threshold failed on other criteria | |
| Not met | Record does not demonstrate national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
