Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
O-1AComputer science and AIEmployerDecided February 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB142024_01D8101

JudgingMetScholarly articlesMetLeading or critical roleNot metOriginal contributionsNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Summary is being reviewed; the table above reflects the decision record.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Director determined beneficiary fulfilled judging criterion
  • Scholarly articles · Director determined beneficiary fulfilled scholarly articles criterion

What was missing

  • Leading or critical role · No detailed letter from person with personal knowledge; counsel letter and impact charts insufficient to demonstrate critical or essential employment role
  • Original contributions · High journal rankings and first authorship do not demonstrate major significance; petitioner failed to show citations are unusually high or compare favorably to majorly significant works

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetDirector determined beneficiary fulfilled judging criterion
Scholarly articlesMetDirector determined beneficiary fulfilled scholarly articles criterion
Leading or critical roleNot metNo detailed letter from person with personal knowledge; counsel letter and impact charts insufficient to demonstrate critical or essential employment role
Original contributionsNot metHigh journal rankings and first authorship do not demonstrate major significance; petitioner failed to show citations are unusually high or compare favorably to majorly significant works
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedNo major internationally recognized award claimed
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedCriterion not claimed by petitioner
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedCriterion not claimed by petitioner
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedCriterion not claimed by petitioner
Final meritsNot reached / not discussedBeneficiary satisfied only two of three required criteria; final merits determination not reached

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.