Outcome: Dismissed
FEB142024_01D8101
Our summary
Summary is being reviewed; the table above reflects the decision record.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Director determined beneficiary fulfilled judging criterion
- Scholarly articles · Director determined beneficiary fulfilled scholarly articles criterion
What was missing
- Leading or critical role · No detailed letter from person with personal knowledge; counsel letter and impact charts insufficient to demonstrate critical or essential employment role
- Original contributions · High journal rankings and first authorship do not demonstrate major significance; petitioner failed to show citations are unusually high or compare favorably to majorly significant works
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director determined beneficiary fulfilled judging criterion | |
| Met | Director determined beneficiary fulfilled scholarly articles criterion | |
| Not met | No detailed letter from person with personal knowledge; counsel letter and impact charts insufficient to demonstrate critical or essential employment role | |
| Not met | High journal rankings and first authorship do not demonstrate major significance; petitioner failed to show citations are unusually high or compare favorably to majorly significant works | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | No major internationally recognized award claimed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed by petitioner | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed by petitioner | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed by petitioner | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Beneficiary satisfied only two of three required criteria; final merits determination not reached |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
