Outcome: Dismissed
FEB152024_01B2203
Our summary
An entrepreneur, city councilor and philanthropist sought EB-1A classification, claiming six evidentiary criteria. The AAO found the awards, original contributions and scholarly articles criteria unmet, reserved two others, and concluded fewer than three criteria were satisfied. It dismissed the appeal without a formal final merits analysis.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Both awards came from city councils, with no showing of national or international recognition.
- Original contributions · Drafting a resolution creating a commission was not shown to be original or of major significance.
- Scholarly articles · The book and related material were not shown to be scholarly articles in qualifying publications.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Both awards came from city councils, with no showing of national or international recognition. | |
| Not met | Drafting a resolution creating a commission was not shown to be original or of major significance. | |
| Not met | The book and related material were not shown to be scholarly articles in qualifying publications. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellate arguments reserved because the three-criterion threshold was not met. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellate arguments reserved because the three-criterion threshold was not met. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | No formal final merits determination was made, though the record in aggregate was noted as insufficient. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
