Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
O-1AMarketing, media, communicationsAgentDecided 2014Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB182014_02D8101

AwardsNot metLeading or critical roleNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzed

Our summary

A copywriter and creative supervisor sought O-1A classification; petitioner abandoned two criteria and failed to meet at least three of the remaining criteria. AAO affirmed dismissal, finding beneficiary did not qualify and comparable evidence was not applicable.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Petitioner failed to submit sufficient documentary or corroborating evidence of claimed awards.
  • Leading or critical role · Evidence did not establish beneficiary's role was essential or critical to prior employers or differentiated him from other staff.
  • Original contributions · Petitioner failed to establish beneficiary made original business-related contributions of major significance.
  • Published material · Petitioner failed to establish articles were about beneficiary relating to his work.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metPetitioner failed to submit sufficient documentary or corroborating evidence of claimed awards.
Leading or critical roleNot metEvidence did not establish beneficiary's role was essential or critical to prior employers or differentiated him from other staff.
Original contributionsNot metPetitioner failed to establish beneficiary made original business-related contributions of major significance.
Published materialNot metPetitioner failed to establish articles were about beneficiary relating to his work.
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner abandoned claim of eligibility under this criterion.
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner abandoned claim of eligibility under this criterion.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.