Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
O-1ASports and athleticsEmployerDecided February 2021Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB262021_03D8101

AwardsMetLeading or critical roleMetHigh salaryNot metMembershipNot metJudgingClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Summary is being reviewed; the table above reflects the decision record.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Awards · Director determined beneficiary met this criterion; not disputed on appeal
  • Leading or critical role · Director determined beneficiary met this criterion at initial stage; not disputed on appeal

What was missing

  • High salary · Petitioner did not address criterion or present evidence after RFE opportunity; not raised on appeal
  • Membership · USA Gymnastics membership does not require outstanding achievements; no showing that membership judged by recognized national or international experts

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsMetDirector determined beneficiary met this criterion; not disputed on appeal
Leading or critical roleMetDirector determined beneficiary met this criterion at initial stage; not disputed on appeal
High salaryNot metPetitioner did not address criterion or present evidence after RFE opportunity; not raised on appeal
MembershipNot metUSA Gymnastics membership does not require outstanding achievements; no showing that membership judged by recognized national or international experts
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or analyzed
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or analyzed
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or analyzed
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or analyzed
Final meritsNot reached / not discussedDid not meet three criteria; totality determination not reached

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.