Outcome: Dismissed
FEB262021_04B2203
Our summary
A singer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification, claiming seven criteria. The AAO found three criteria met (awards, published material, judging), satisfying the threshold, but dismissed the appeal because the totality of evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Awards · Director found petitioner met lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes criterion
- Judging · Director found petitioner met participation as judge criterion
- Published material · AAO concluded petitioner submitted published material satisfying criterion
What was missing
- Final merits · Totality of evidence does not show sustained acclaim or top-tier status in field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found petitioner met lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes criterion | |
| Met | Director found petitioner met participation as judge criterion | |
| Met | AAO concluded petitioner submitted published material satisfying criterion | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision | |
| Not met | Totality of evidence does not show sustained acclaim or top-tier status in field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
