Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided 2021Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB262021_04B2203

AwardsMetJudgingMetPublished materialMetExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A singer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification, claiming seven criteria. The AAO found three criteria met (awards, published material, judging), satisfying the threshold, but dismissed the appeal because the totality of evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Awards · Director found petitioner met lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes criterion
  • Judging · Director found petitioner met participation as judge criterion
  • Published material · AAO concluded petitioner submitted published material satisfying criterion

What was missing

  • Final merits · Totality of evidence does not show sustained acclaim or top-tier status in field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsMetDirector found petitioner met lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes criterion
JudgingMetDirector found petitioner met participation as judge criterion
Published materialMetAAO concluded petitioner submitted published material satisfying criterion
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in decision
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in decision
Final meritsNot metTotality of evidence does not show sustained acclaim or top-tier status in field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.