EB-1ABusiness and managementEmployerDecided February 2025Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
FEB262025_02B2203
Original contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Business manager specializing in supply chain management and strategic purchasing sought EB-1A classification. Director found one criterion met; AAO withdrew this finding. Petitioner failed to establish three required criteria: published materials concerned employer not petitioner; support letters for original contributions lacked detail and corroboration; record showed no sustained acclaim at top of field. Dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Original contributions · Support letters lacked sufficient detail; no evidence contributions rose to major significance beyond employer benefit
- Published material · Published materials were about employer and industry, not petitioner; publications not established as major media
- Final merits · No evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or placement among small percentage at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Original contributions | Not met | Support letters lacked sufficient detail; no evidence contributions rose to major significance beyond employer benefit |
 Published material | Not met | Published materials were about employer and industry, not petitioner; publications not established as major media |
 High salary | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed on appeal but not substantively analyzed in decision |
 Leading or critical role | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed on appeal but not substantively analyzed in decision |
 Final merits | Not met | No evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or placement among small percentage at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.