Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided February 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB272020_01B2203

AwardsMetOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Competitive rower self-petitioner sought extraordinary ability classification. AAO found petitioner met only one of ten criteria (awards) but needed three. Published material and original contributions claims were rejected for insufficient evidence of major significance. Final merits finding rejected as petitioner lacked sustained international acclaim required for classification.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Awards · First place finish in 2016 international rowing competition established as nationally or internationally recognized award

What was missing

  • Original contributions · Letters lacked specifics and used hyperbolic language; no evidence of major significance in rowing field
  • Published material · Articles must be about the petitioner relating to work; mere mentions or articles without author do not qualify
  • Final merits · Petitioner has not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsMetFirst place finish in 2016 international rowing competition established as nationally or internationally recognized award
Original contributionsNot metLetters lacked specifics and used hyperbolic language; no evidence of major significance in rowing field
Published materialNot metArticles must be about the petitioner relating to work; mere mentions or articles without author do not qualify
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedCriterion claimed but AAO did not provide detailed analysis; subsumed in overall finding
Final meritsNot metPetitioner has not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.