EB-1ALife sciences and medicineIndividualDecided 2007Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Feb072007_01B2203
JudgingNot metMembershipNot metScholarly articlesNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Research associate in sciences sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Petitioner claimed membership in Sigma Xi, judging, and scholarly articles criteria. AAO found Sigma Xi membership with 70,000 members non-exclusive, manuscript review routine without evidence of exceptional volume or editorial distinction, and publication record insufficient without independent corroboration of sustained top-level recognition.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Judging · Manuscript review is routine in field; no evidence of unusual volume, independent journal requests, or editorial position.
- Membership · Sigma Xi membership with 70,000 members does not represent very small percentage at top; not initially claimed.
- Scholarly articles · Publication record and reference letters insufficient; unsolicited materials do not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.
- Final merits · Evidence demonstrates talent but does not establish placement at very top of field or sustained national or international acclaim.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Judging | Not met | Manuscript review is routine in field; no evidence of unusual volume, independent journal requests, or editorial position. |
 Membership | Not met | Sigma Xi membership with 70,000 members does not represent very small percentage at top; not initially claimed. |
 Scholarly articles | Not met | Publication record and reference letters insufficient; unsolicited materials do not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence demonstrates talent but does not establish placement at very top of field or sustained national or international acclaim. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.