EB-1ALife sciences and medicineIndividualDecided 2012Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Feb082012_02B2203
Published materialNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
A research associate sought EB-1A classification, with counsel claiming at least three criteria. The AAO examined the published material criterion and found it unmet because the submitted article lacked a stated author. It concluded the evidence did not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing, and dismissed the appeal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Published material · Submitted article lacked the required author information and was not shown to be published material about the petitioner.
- Final merits · Evidence did not show achievements placing the petitioner significantly above almost all others in the field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Published material | Not met | Submitted article lacked the required author information and was not shown to be published material about the petitioner. |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence did not show achievements placing the petitioner significantly above almost all others in the field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.