Outcome: Dismissed
Feb192008_02B2203
Our summary
Musician claimed extraordinary ability based on judging, publications, original contributions, scholarly articles, and exhibitions. AAO found musician met judging criterion but failed publications, original contributions, scholarly articles, and exhibitions criteria. Evidence demonstrated talent and some national exposure but not sustained acclaim at the very top level.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Evidence of extensive judging at significant events sufficiently extensive in aggregate
What was missing
- Exhibitions · Live music performances do not serve as exhibitions; criterion applies to visual artists
- Original contributions · Contributions not demonstrated as major significance; compact disc sales unsupported
- Published material · Brief news note in Wave magazine insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim
- Scholarly articles · Articles are popular not scholarly analyses of music
- Final merits · Evidence shows talent and national exposure but not sustained acclaim at very top level
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Evidence of extensive judging at significant events sufficiently extensive in aggregate | |
| Not met | Live music performances do not serve as exhibitions; criterion applies to visual artists | |
| Not met | Contributions not demonstrated as major significance; compact disc sales unsupported | |
| Not met | Brief news note in Wave magazine insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim | |
| Not met | Articles are popular not scholarly analyses of music | |
| Not met | Evidence shows talent and national exposure but not sustained acclaim at very top level |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
