Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided 2008Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Feb192008_02B2203

JudgingMetExhibitionsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metScholarly articlesNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Musician claimed extraordinary ability based on judging, publications, original contributions, scholarly articles, and exhibitions. AAO found musician met judging criterion but failed publications, original contributions, scholarly articles, and exhibitions criteria. Evidence demonstrated talent and some national exposure but not sustained acclaim at the very top level.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Evidence of extensive judging at significant events sufficiently extensive in aggregate

What was missing

  • Exhibitions · Live music performances do not serve as exhibitions; criterion applies to visual artists
  • Original contributions · Contributions not demonstrated as major significance; compact disc sales unsupported
  • Published material · Brief news note in Wave magazine insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim
  • Scholarly articles · Articles are popular not scholarly analyses of music
  • Final merits · Evidence shows talent and national exposure but not sustained acclaim at very top level

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetEvidence of extensive judging at significant events sufficiently extensive in aggregate
ExhibitionsNot metLive music performances do not serve as exhibitions; criterion applies to visual artists
Original contributionsNot metContributions not demonstrated as major significance; compact disc sales unsupported
Published materialNot metBrief news note in Wave magazine insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim
Scholarly articlesNot metArticles are popular not scholarly analyses of music
Final meritsNot metEvidence shows talent and national exposure but not sustained acclaim at very top level

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.