Outcome: Dismissed
Feb202008_05B2203
Our summary
Phlebology professional claiming extraordinary ability in sciences. Petitioner submitted evidence of awards, membership, and published material. AAO found awards lacked national or international recognition, membership did not meet regulatory requirements, and published materials were not primarily about the petitioner. Petition denied.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Honorable mention and club awards lack national or international recognition required by plain language of criterion
- Membership · Membership requirements based on employment, education or dues do not satisfy criterion
- Published material · Articles lack required English translations and are not primarily about the petitioner
- Final merits · Overall evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Honorable mention and club awards lack national or international recognition required by plain language of criterion | |
| Not met | Membership requirements based on employment, education or dues do not satisfy criterion | |
| Not met | Articles lack required English translations and are not primarily about the petitioner | |
| Not met | Overall evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
