Outcome: Dismissed
Feb292008_01B2203
Our summary
Pharmacology researcher sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed fellowships and professional memberships. AAO found fellowships designed for early-career researchers lack prestige, memberships either post-dated petition or lacked stringent requirements, and evidence insufficient to show top-field distinction.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Institutional fellowships for early-career researchers insufficient; no evidence most renowned field members aspire to them
- Membership · Memberships joined after filing date or do not demonstrate outstanding member achievements
- Final merits · Postdoctoral researcher shows promise but achievements do not set him significantly above peers at top level
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Institutional fellowships for early-career researchers insufficient; no evidence most renowned field members aspire to them | |
| Not met | Memberships joined after filing date or do not demonstrate outstanding member achievements | |
| Not met | Postdoctoral researcher shows promise but achievements do not set him significantly above peers at top level |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
