Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AEducation and academiaIndividualDecided 2015Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JAN062015_01B2203

AwardsNot metExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Self-petitioner anthropologist sought EB-1A classification claiming awards, publications, original contributions, exhibitions, and leading role. Most criteria raised for first time on appeal without clear connection to anthropology field. Petitioner failed three-criterion threshold; appeal dismissed.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Petitioner failed to establish receipt of nationally or internationally recognized prize or award.
  • Final merits · Review of evidence in aggregate does not support level of expertise required for classification.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metPetitioner failed to establish receipt of nationally or internationally recognized prize or award.
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed on appeal but not adequately addressed; relationship to anthropology field unclear.
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed on appeal but not analyzed in decision.
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed on appeal but not raised before director; insufficient evidence of association membership.
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed on appeal but relationship to anthropology field unclear; not adequately analyzed.
Final meritsNot metReview of evidence in aggregate does not support level of expertise required for classification.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.