Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineEmployerDecided January 2026Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JAN072026_06B5203

Merit and national importanceMetWell positionedNot metBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Physician-researcher proposing cancer research claims national interest waiver. AAO found first prong met: research has national importance. However, second prong failed: evidence from references lacked specific examples of research impact or progress, and citation metrics did not adequately demonstrate exceptional success.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Merit and national importance · Proposed cancer research has substantial merit and national importance; clinical and teaching duties do not.

What was missing

  • Well positioned · References did not provide specific evidence of research success or progress; citation metrics and record insufficient to show expert positioning.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceMetProposed cancer research has substantial merit and national importance; clinical and teaching duties do not.
Well positionedNot metReferences did not provide specific evidence of research success or progress; citation metrics and record insufficient to show expert positioning.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedFailure on second prong is dispositive; third prong not analyzed.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.