Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided January 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JAN092020_01B2203

MembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A Sherpa mountaineering expedition leader seeking EB-1A classification claimed membership, published material, and original contributions. The AAO rejected all claims: membership reflected experience and dues rather than expert-judged achievements, published material lacked proper attribution, and overall record failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Membership · Membership based on summiting experience and dues payment, not outstanding achievements judged by national or international experts
  • Original contributions · Significant mountaineering experience does not establish extraordinary ability or sustained national and international acclaim
  • Published material · Sources lack author attribution; website not established as professional or major trade publication
  • Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among very top of field despite mountaineering achievements

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
MembershipNot metMembership based on summiting experience and dues payment, not outstanding achievements judged by national or international experts
Original contributionsNot metSignificant mountaineering experience does not establish extraordinary ability or sustained national and international acclaim
Published materialNot metSources lack author attribution; website not established as professional or major trade publication
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner did not claim or provide evidence for this criterion
Final meritsNot metRecord does not demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among very top of field despite mountaineering achievements

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.