Outcome: Dismissed
JAN112018_01B2203
Our summary
Neonatologist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met only two initial criteria: scholarly articles and leading role. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to meet three-criterion threshold and aggregate record did not demonstrate sustained national acclaim or top-tier expertise.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Petitioner performed leading role streamlining neonatal protocols for distinguished organization
- Scholarly articles · Director found petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications
What was missing
- High salary · Salary of $231,255 not demonstrated as high relative to others in neonatology field during same period
- Original contributions · Publications and presentations insufficient; no evidence of unusually influential or widely applied contributions
- Final merits · Aggregate record does not support extraordinary ability or top percentage standing required
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Petitioner performed leading role streamlining neonatal protocols for distinguished organization | |
| Met | Director found petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications | |
| Not met | Salary of $231,255 not demonstrated as high relative to others in neonatology field during same period | |
| Not met | Publications and presentations insufficient; no evidence of unusually influential or widely applied contributions | |
| Not met | Aggregate record does not support extraordinary ability or top percentage standing required |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
