Outcome: Dismissed
JAN152025_02B2203
Our summary
Entrepreneur in business and immigration investment sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed six criteria including published material, original contributions, and scholarly articles. AAO found published material deficient due to missing metadata and post-filing dates, original contributions lacked evidence of major field significance, and petition failed to meet three-criterion threshold for final merits analysis.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No evidence of major, internationally recognized award submitted
- Original contributions · No evidence contributions were of major significance in the field
- Published material · Articles lacked required metadata, were paid advertisements, or published after petition filing
- Final merits · Sustained national or international acclaim not established; not top small percentage
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No evidence of major, internationally recognized award submitted | |
| Not met | No evidence contributions were of major significance in the field | |
| Not met | Articles lacked required metadata, were paid advertisements, or published after petition filing | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but reserved as issue not dispositive | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; reserved as issue not dispositive | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but waived on appeal; not addressed in decision | |
| Not met | Sustained national or international acclaim not established; not top small percentage |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
