Outcome: Dismissed
JAN152026_02B2203
Our summary
A cosmetics expert claimed extraordinary ability through seven criteria. The petitioner established judging and scholarly articles but failed awards and published material. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the record insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Decision states criterion satisfied but provides no detail
- Scholarly articles · Decision states criterion satisfied but provides no detail
What was missing
- Awards · Certificates lacked evidence of wider recognition beyond awarding organization
- Published material · Publication outlet not established as professional or major trade publication
- Final merits · Overall evidence insufficient to show sustained national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Decision states criterion satisfied but provides no detail | |
| Met | Decision states criterion satisfied but provides no detail | |
| Not met | Certificates lacked evidence of wider recognition beyond awarding organization | |
| Not met | Publication outlet not established as professional or major trade publication | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed initially but petitioner did not discuss in RFE response | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed initially but petitioner did not discuss in RFE response | |
| Not met | Overall evidence insufficient to show sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
